All proposals undergo blind review. We greatly value the contribution that the blind review process makes in conference presentation selections and appreciate the time that our reviewers take from their busy schedule to assist us in our efforts to build a great program.


2017 Reviewers


We wish to take this opportunity to recognize and thank our 2017 Lilly-Bethesda reviewers:

Abalo Adewui , Central Michigan University

Spencer Benson, University of Macau

Tinukwa Boulder, Gannon University

Julie Breitfelder, Gannon University

Summer Cherland, South Mountain Community College

Corrine Coniglio, King's College

Dana D'Angelo, Drexel University

Ming Dai, Central Michigan University

Marianne Diedwardo, University of Maryland University College

Peter Eberle, Pennsylvania State University

Billie Franchini, University at Albany - SUNY

Amanda Holton, University of California, Irvine

Anthony Hoos, Howard Community College

Stephanie Laggini Fiore, Temple University

Madhu Mahalingam, University of the Sciences

Linda Rice, Ohio University

Marla Thompson, Life University

Janina Tosic, M√ľnster University of Applied Sciences

Kimberly Van Orman, University at Albany - SUNY

Sue Wick, University of Minnesota


Invitation to Review


If you are interested in the opportunity to review proposals for the Lilly Conferences, click here to contact us. This obligation entails: reading 3-4 proposals, evaluating each using a given rubric, and making the recommendation that the proposal be A) accepted as submitted, B) accepted with revisions, or C) accepted in a different format than the author requested. If you have any questions about how the process works please do not hesitate to ask.

  • Black Facebook Icon
  • Black Twitter Icon
  • Black LinkedIn Icon